Floating Conclusions and Zombie Paths: Two Deep Difficulties in the "Directly Skeptical" Approach to Defeasible Inheritance Nets

نویسندگان

  • David Makinson
  • Karl Schlechta
چکیده

Makinson, D. and K. Schlechta, Floating conclusions and zombie paths: two deep difficulties in the "directly skeptical" approach to defeasible inheritance nets (Research Note), Artificial Intelligence 48 (1991) 199-209. We discuss two difficulties in the "directly skeptical" approach to inference in defeasible inheritance nets, as developed by Horty, Thomason and Touretzky. We suggest that as a result of the general architecture of the approach, it is intrinsically unable to deal with a phenomenon of "floating conclusions", and has great difficulty in accommodating a phenomenon of "zombi paths". The conclusion drawn is that the directly skeptical approach cannot hope to do the work of an approach via the family of all extensions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Skeptical Inheritance: Computing the Intersection of Credulous Extensions

Ideally skeptical inheritance supports exactly those inferences true in every credulous extension of an inheritance hierarchy. We provide a formal definition of ideally skeptical inheritance. We show that two path-based approaches fail to capture ideally skeptical inheritance , and that there are inheritance hierarchies for which there are more always-true inferences than always-supported paths...

متن کامل

A Skeptical Theory of Inheritance in Nonmonotonic Semantic Networks

This paper describes a new approach to inheritance reasoning in semantic networks allowing for multiple inheritance with exceptions. The approach leads to an analysis of defeasible inheritance which is both well-defined and intuitively attractive: it yields unambiguous results applied to any acyclic semantic network, and the results conform to our intuitions in those cases in which the intuitio...

متن کامل

A Directly Cautious Theory of Defeasible Consequence for Default Logic via the Notion of General Extension

This paper introduces a generalization of Reiter’s notion of “extension” for default logic. The main difference from the original version mainly lies in the way conflicts among defaults are handled: in particular, this notion of “general extension” allows defaults not explicitly triggered to pre-empt other defaults. A consequence of the adoption of such a notion of extension is that the collect...

متن کامل

Defeasible inheritance with doubt index and its axiomatic characterization

This article introduces and uses a representation of defeasible inheritance networks where links in the network are viewed as propositions, and where defeasible links are tagged with a quantitative indication of the proportion of exceptions, called the doubt index. This doubt index is used for restricting the length of the chains of inference. The representation also introduces the use of defea...

متن کامل

A Skeptic's Menagerie: Conflictors, Preemptors, Reinstaters, and Zombies in Nonrnonotonic Inheritance

Subtle differences in the method of constructing arguments in inheritance systems can result in profound differences in both the conclusions reached and the efficiency of inference. This paper focuses on issues surrounding the defeat of arguments in nonmonotonic inheritance. Looking primarily at skeptical reasoners, we analyze several types of defeat that may be encountered, especially the defe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Artif. Intell.

دوره 48  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1991